The Spiritual Dilution of Showing Off

There’s a religious cycle I see regularly. Someone who’s a Christian, almost inevitably of an Evangelical variety, does some extremely public preaching, often to the inconvenience of others (say, on an airplane). People discussing them inevitably invoke the Bible, Matthew 6:5-6 (give or take):

5. And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

(King James version, naturally)

I’ve seen this quote bought up many times over the decades and never thought about it too much. It’s advice against being a preening asshole and showoff, and hey, good enough for me. These people who supposedly know their Bible might want a refresher course and to also leave us alone.

However the latest round of this inevitable evangelism-leads-to-bible-quoting (a woman annoying people on an airplane) got me thinking. I’d gotten so used to this cycle, but in this case I got thinking about it more deeply. I suspect my own spiritual studies and contemplations of media had me in the right headspace to ask “why is this so important?”

Now I’m all for Jesus’ injunction against showing off spiritual practice. I mean I’m all for public rituals and shared spiritual spaces and the like, those have their place. But also that warning against being some big public religions showoff seemed so obvious I never analyzed it.

So I got to thinking about it. I also didn’t have to think much to realize that such a warning is actually pretty good for people of any religious persuasion. Yes, that includes atheists.

When you’re busy showing off your religious beliefs, really putting on the show for maximum exposure, it’s not about your religious beliefs. It’s about showing off, it’s about being noticed, it’s about whatever agenda you have. You’ve turned serious practice into marketing and influence-chasing.

When you’re in private in your spiritual practice, whatever it is, it’s focusing on the actual practice. The temptations to embellish, to show off, etc. are minimized. But when you’re alone, or maybe in a small group, you’re focused on what you’re supposedly actually trying to do.

When you’re running around in public engaging in aggressive religious behavior then it’s not focused on the supposed goals. It’s just showing off and has nothing to do with deeper beliefs. An emphasis on publicity inevitably leads to hypocrisy, and that’s not good for you or your (possibly unhappy) audience.

If you are actually sincere in your religious beliefs, you risk deadening them (and pissing people off). If you’re not sincere you’re just going to get worse and are probably avoiding the therapy you so desperately need.

I think this also extends, honestly, to public preaching in some cases. At my campus we used to have preachers show up in public space. But know what? They used public space, they kept to their own areas, I can respect that. They weren’t trapping someone on a plane or a bus.

Religious displays need to be approached with caution. You can end up turning your deep beliefs into a performance, and loose that spiritual connection to what you believe.

Also you’re probably being an asshole. But that goes without saying.

Xenofact

Maximum Exposure, Maximum Influencer Brain

The term “Influencer Brain” is one that I’ve been using a lot lately. It basically refers to the way some people get so used to trying to be Social Media influencers, it warps how they think. They think in hits and likes, stirring up controversy and making memes, maximum exposure, maximum talk. Everything gets warped through the Social Media bubble, to the point where even meaningful things are meaningless.

I’m sure you’ve seen Influencer Brain. It’s probably gotten some of your friends and family. It’s definitely gotten quite a few politicians, media stars, and supposed business geniuses. It’s also really goddamn annoying because it’s hard to have a human conversation with someone who has Influencer Brain.

Now one area I’ve noticed Influencer Brain hitting hard is Very Online Christians and some Christian media stars. There’s the “Jesus Glow-Up” people who, I guess, use good lighting to show how Jesus made them more photogenic? There’s people gladly seeking controversy to raise their profile and probably get a gig on some blog or get donations for, I don’t know, being a jerk. It seems pretty weird considering Jesus even warned people about praying in public.

Is Christianity (in American) more prone to this kind of Influencer Brain? Well, that’s actually not what I want to explore. Because here’s the thing.

Christianity is the dominant religion in America. It is quite politicized thanks to various social-political efforts and traditions. So simply put if you see a lot of annoying Christian Influencers, how much of that is simply by the odds? If you’re going to see annoying people with Influencer Brain, wouldn’t they practice (well, pretend to practice) the dominant religion, especially one that is politicized?

I think we pretty much can guess yeah, it probably is. I have larger theories but let’s be honest, the numbers are a big thing here.

I think of this as a good warning, and a bit of humility. It may be easy for non-Christians like myself to have a good laugh at them. We may also take the fact that we see such widespread behavior very seriously as some of these Influencers do outrageous and dangerous stuff. But under different circumstances we might be at risk.

We might even be at risk in our own spiritual practice. What if your particular brand of paganism gets popular? What if you suddenly have a book on meditation take off? What if you just get pissed at these people, make reaction videos, they become a hit then you face audience capture?

I think it’s important as we understand Influencer culture to tease out the different parts of it, moreso when it comes to spiritual and political practices. There is some damn pathological stuff out there, but it might also be literally due to the odds, and we can read too much into it – and get too arrogant.

Besides, as we tease out these threads, we can further get to the important spiritual issues – without trying to sell a course or get in the news or whatever.

Xenofact

The Cross Disintegrates

I’ve been wondering about how people will regard Christianity in America in the future. This is for obvious reasons (the religious right, hypocrisy) and the personal (I love to speculate). Truth be told, I don’t see it being anything good.

First, it’s really obvious that the Religious Right et al has made Christianity synonymous with “Bigoted, sexist, homophobic, reality-denying wealth-worshiping asshole who’s a total hypocrite.” Yes, plenty of American “Christians” violate their own religious tenets which is obvious as hell when you have even a passing understanding of the teachings of Jesus. They also do not care that they are hypocrites and have no spiritual curiosity, if they ever had any. Honestly it’s kind of a joke how Christianity has gotten branded.

Secondly, the media has run with this because the Religious Right is loud. They have money, they are publicity hounds, and they are of course politically active – and useful. The Religious Right has been happy to get involved in everyone else’s damn life, and of course the media amplifies that. Plus the American media loves to both-sides things even when people are ranting or opportunist.

Third, the Religious Right is and will be defined by horrible things. Climate denial. Cruelty towards immigrants (despite a lot of that being critiqued in the Bible). Racism. Selling out. People will be hurt by this, people will be hurt by them, and they seem to enjoy that.

Fourth, and sadly not addressed, I think that non-religious right Christianity hasn’t really fought back. Sure I see some truly good people, you can find all sorts of people doing good things. But I don’t see a fight for the soul of Christianity in America which you’d think would be really freaking necessary. There’s so many people being utter assholes in the name of Jesus, you’d think there’d be a willingness to battle.

But I just don’t see it. Some of it sure, but not enough that’s big, bold and in your face. Christians should be utterly pissed at the legacy of grifters like Robertson and Falweel and the like. They should be out there in people’s faces. Heck, maybe some kind of big public act of repentance and penance that would name names.

For whatever reason, the Religious Right has defined Christianity these days. I don’t see that going away, barring some kind of gigantic Great Awakening/Bonfire of the Vanities type activity. Which might happen, but I’m not holding my breath.

So the future of Christianity, in America, is that the Religious Right has pretty much won. They have the dominant description of Christianity. It’s a cruel, greedy, unstable, pile of hypocrisy glad to elect and worship any grifter that comes along. I don’t see it changing too.

What this means is that in future political and social changing, Christianity – even people who aren’t religious right – will be judged as if they are. People won’t be looking to be Christian if they’re not into the whole asshole paradigm That is if anyone is even looking for a specific religion.

I feel a strange . . . sadness to all of this? First, that there’s just so many assholes, of course. But I feel bad for the non-asshole Christians even if I’d wanted them to fight more. I supposed I’d have liked to see a transition to a broader spirituality, but it feels like part of it will be utter, life-ruining, life-endangering failure.

But I don’t see a future for American Christianity where “Christian” isn’t at least secondarily associated with “awful person.” Maybe there will be some kind of syncretic reformist movement, but that’s just maybe.

Xenofact